The Circle of Hell: What is the actual point of our border control?

Published on 4 July 2026 at 15:56

The British public is trapped in a creeping state of cynicism, watching a system where down is up, left is right, and the law feels actively engineered to protect the wrong people. Two explosive stories have recently collided, exposing a border control framework so tangled in legislative loopholes that it feels less like a functioning system and more like a bureaucratic free-for-all.

When a nation cannot deport a convicted child rapist and unwittingly rolls out the red carpet for an international human trafficker, it is time to ask: What is the actual point of our border control?

The Absolute Worst of the System: The Shabir Ahmed Scandal

The release of Shabir Ahmed (73)—the notorious ringleader of a Rochdale grooming gang jailed for horrific sexual offences against young girls—has sparked understandable national outrage.

Ahmed has served his time and is out of prison. But despite being stripped of his British citizenship, he cannot be deported to Pakistan. Why? Because lawyers have unearthed a staggering combination of legal shields:

  • The 1971 Immunity Loophole: Under the Immigration Act 1971, Commonwealth citizens who arrived in the UK before 1973 and stayed for five years are granted immunity from deportation. A law designed to protect hard-working Commonwealth families is now being used as a shield by a convicted child rapist.
  • The Diplomatic Brick Wall: Pakistan refuses to take him back.
  • The ECHR Factor: Human rights lawyers can pivot to Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to keep him firmly on British soil.

The newly elected MP for Makerfield and incoming Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, has intervened, stating that "nothing is off the table" and demanding a review. Yet critics rightly point out his convenience in finding his voice now, contrasted against his quiet stance on grooming gangs during his previous years in parliament and his time as Manchester Mayor.

The fix should be simple. Parliament could pass a notwithstanding clause explicitly stripping deportation immunity from pre-1973 arrivals if they commit heinous crimes. The Home Secretary could threaten to freeze visas for Pakistani nationals until Islamabad accepts Ahmed. Instead, we watch a multi-million-pound apparatus track him 24/7 in staffed accommodation while his victims live in fear.

"No One Touches Us Here": The King of the Smugglers in Leicester

While the state struggles to evict its worst criminals, it is actively failing to keep international ones out. A recent, astonishing BBC investigation tracked down Twana Jamal, an Iraqi Kurd branded by French prosecutors as "the godfather" of cross-Channel migrant camps.

In 2016, Jamal was sentenced to five years in a French prison for running an enterprise that netted up to £100,000 a week, trafficking illegal immigrants. Today? He is living comfortably in Leicestershire, driving a BMW without a licence, working illegally, and actively claiming asylum in the UK under a false name.

Journalists even linked him to two brightly coloured "Candy Corner" mini-marts in the small village of Blaby, mysteriously operating just metres apart and selling vapes right next door to a Conservative MP’s constituency office.

Jamal was recorded boasting:

"We know everyone in this city; this city is ours... No one touches us here. Even the police won’t stop you."

The Post-Brexit Information Blackout

How does a convicted international human trafficker successfully apply for British asylum? The answer lies in a post-Brexit data black hole.

While the UK fingerprints arrivals, border officials only run checks against domestic databases. Because Britain no longer has automatic data-sharing agreements with the European Union, the Home Office has no idea if an asylum seeker has a severe criminal record in France, Germany, or Belgium unless they manually call Paris to check. The BBC estimates there are at least 20 active people smugglers currently living in the UK using fake identities.

Mass Migration vs. The Welfare State

The asylum system has evolved into a lucrative criminal industry. Smuggling gangs run social media accounts explicitly instructing migrants on how easily the UK system can be circumvented. 

The Asylum Timeline and System Abuse

  • Early New Labour Era: Asylum applications hit a high peak.
  • Late New Labour Era: The numbers saw a sharp, dramatic decline.
  • The Tory Legacy: Applications began climbing rapidly under the previous Conservative government, leaving behind an unprecedented structural backlog.
  • The Modern Crisis: Total applications peaked at historic highs of over 80,000 claims.
  • The Modern Reality: A third of all modern applicants arrive via dangerous, illegal small boat crossings.
  • The Economic Impact: The system is facing widespread exploitation, shifting the country from "immigration to work" toward "immigration to welfare".

The old economic argument was that the UK needed mass migration to prop up the NHS and the welfare state. But the reality has flipped. Because migrants are increasingly bringing dependents and entering a backlogged system, it is placing a monumental strain on local public infrastructure. We are no longer experiencing "immigration to work"; we are presiding over "immigration to welfare".

Is Government Policy Just "Vibes"?

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has proposed an Immigration and Asylum Bill introducing a Canadian-style "community sponsorship" model. This allows businesses, universities, or charities to financially sponsor refugees for a year and integrate them into work.

While it sounds noble, critics are raising immediate alarms. Without a strict cap, this creates an unmonitored back door. Specific communities, religious groups, or universities will naturally sponsor individuals from their own regions, expanding net migration further. Meanwhile, Labour figures like Angela Rayner continue to push for exemptions that weaken border controls.

The British public is tired of political leaders relying on "good vibes," empty rhetoric, and superficial social media videos to answer deep, structural crises. When the state code-protects sex offenders and misses international kingpins trading on our high streets, the calls for a total immigration moratorium transition from a fringe position into common sense.

If we cannot secure our borders from the very worst elements of the world, then the system isn't just broken—it's entirely pointless.

Final Thoughts: The Way Forward

The state cannot continue to hide behind decades-old legislative knots while its border security defaults into a legal quagmire. Addressing these system failures requires an immediate departure from ideological posturing and a rapid return to common-sense enforcement. To truly address this crisis and rebuild public trust, the incoming Burnham government must introduce an immediate moratorium on immigration until these dangerous database loopholes are completely closed.

Simultaneously, the administration must urgently fix the post-Brexit data-sharing deficit with mainland Europe, so international criminal records can be instantly flagged. At the same time, the Home Office needs the absolute legal authority to close historical deportation loopholes for individuals convicted of severe, life-altering crimes.

#TwanaJamal #Communistysponsorship #Deportationloophole

 

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.